"For in the end, [Huxley] was trying to tell us what afflicted the people in Brave New World was not that they were laughing instead of thinking, but that they did not know what they were laughing about and why they had stopped thinking." --Neil Postman

Monday, July 23, 2018

Thinking... a forgotten skill

   
      As I was reading through the book The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble To Get Inside Our Heads by Tim Wu I noticed how some of his points shined through on my own life. With the rise of social media, almost everybody is glued to their phones. Myself included, I wondered how much am I being affected by the adds we see every day. The problem with this question is there is really no way to answer. Because adds are just a suggestion  and we as the consumer have the free will to chose if we click on them or not how can we tell how bad we are getting affected. This can be used as an excuse for companies to plaster adds almost every where. As we do almost any everyday task we are bombarded with adds. If we think about doing something as simple watching a video or walking going to the store we are almost guaranteed to see  one ad. This leads up to my one question is thinking for yourself a forgotten skill?
      With the prevalence of adds today I believe that our society isn't as free thinking as we believe. This is because everything we see affects us, and companies can use this to influence our minds. Even if we  don't click on the add, after seeing the same add multiple times we can safely say that we know what that adds is about. This means that even that if we try to ignore the add, over time we will know the products contents or what that product does. This is great for companies because they can have a number of people know their product even if they people aren't generally interested.
      The same thing can be said about bigger issues, such as politics. This is where the use adds can be scary, in that the media can push their side of the story to sway people and get them to have certain beliefs. Although these media websites may be trying to do the right thing, they also are reliant on views due to the fact that their company is paid by views. This can lead to exaggerated and even false claims that can be the cause of civil unrest and violence. This can cause a split in society and cause animosity between people all over the world. It can also make people feel unsafe because of some of the generalizations the media puts out.
   In the end I believe that todays society doesn't think for itself enough. I think people should do their own research before believing in something that was told to them. In the end this is not my opinion  that matters, but its society as a whole to think for themselves.  

-Brenden Dy

1 comment:

  1. I understand your perspective of how businesses and their advertisements are persistently pressing their products and ideas at us; I too admit to clicking on an advertisement because of its attractive price. Yes this has pros and cons, and you are only speaking of the cons. As a rebuttal, I will explain the causes, effects, and pros of such business methods. It's noticeable that people are "glued" to their phones in modern society, and that can be due to social media, games, any other form of communication, or an important reason. Businesses take this into account and use it to their advantage to adverse their products, this leads to the increase of macro/microeconomics. This is great in order to keep a nation in a superior state. If you were to compare an economically successful country compared to a non successful country, the global superior is the one with best economics. This leads to another fact: with better economics comes better communication and global connection, also known as Americanization/globalization.
    I argue that people in this society are free-thinking, yet their are those who just jump on the bandwagon (Trump supporters/adversaries are great examples,they just choose a side without fully understanding). Today in this sensitive, people are beginning to follow the ideology of individualism, an example would be the rights for homosexuals.
    I slightly agree with your idea of how companies exaggerate in order to gain views and supporters. To an extent this does lead to false claims, but its more noted that individuals and small groups do such things, not companies. The irony is: why would companies do such a thing if they want to expand and have a good reputation? To conclude this, iI also agree that people should do their own research before diving in on anything nowadays.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.